<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debian should update their Snort package</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/16/debian-should-update-their-snort-package.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/16/debian-should-update-their-snort-package.html</link>
	<description>Everything inline.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Week&#8217;s Links &#124; lonerunners.net</title>
		<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/16/debian-should-update-their-snort-package.html#comment-12057</link>
		<dc:creator>Week&#8217;s Links &#124; lonerunners.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=87#comment-12057</guid>
		<description>[...] Debian should update their Snort package [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Debian should update their Snort package [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thijs</title>
		<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/16/debian-should-update-their-snort-package.html#comment-11243</link>
		<dc:creator>Thijs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=87#comment-11243</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, some time to develop the rulesets made most of Debian's concerns go away, and Snort 2.7 will be in the next release (lenny / 5.0).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, some time to develop the rulesets made most of Debian&#8217;s concerns go away, and Snort 2.7 will be in the next release (lenny / 5.0).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco del Semmlero</title>
		<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/16/debian-should-update-their-snort-package.html#comment-9215</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco del Semmlero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=87#comment-9215</guid>
		<description>Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrgggggh!

Debian is so damn ugly sometimes.
If you want to protect a network, you *awfully* need a curent ruleset and a well-working, sophisticated version of SNORT!

Those blind freaks!

UPDATE NOW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrgggggh!</p>
<p>Debian is so damn ugly sometimes.<br />
If you want to protect a network, you *awfully* need a curent ruleset and a well-working, sophisticated version of SNORT!</p>
<p>Those blind freaks!</p>
<p>UPDATE NOW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bejtlich</title>
		<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/16/debian-should-update-their-snort-package.html#comment-4640</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bejtlich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 00:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=87#comment-4640</guid>
		<description>This is a great example why I never use a port/packaging system when installing Snort, even (gasp) on my beloved FreeBSD.  

Most importantly, I install from source because I can deploy the new version immediately, and not wait for an updated port or package.  Furthermore I can customize it however I like.

Much as I like Debian, this is a dumb idea on the package maintainer's part.  The "engine" vs "service" idea is particularly stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great example why I never use a port/packaging system when installing Snort, even (gasp) on my beloved FreeBSD.  </p>
<p>Most importantly, I install from source because I can deploy the new version immediately, and not wait for an updated port or package.  Furthermore I can customize it however I like.</p>
<p>Much as I like Debian, this is a dumb idea on the package maintainer&#8217;s part.  The &#8220;engine&#8221; vs &#8220;service&#8221; idea is particularly stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
