<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TCP Window scaling in Snort_inline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/16/tcp-window-scaling-in-snort_inline.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/16/tcp-window-scaling-in-snort_inline.html</link>
	<description>Everything inline.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Victor Julien</title>
		<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/16/tcp-window-scaling-in-snort_inline.html#comment-11206</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Julien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=85#comment-11206</guid>
		<description>Yes, that is correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuzhenlin</title>
		<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/16/tcp-window-scaling-in-snort_inline.html#comment-11204</link>
		<dc:creator>chuzhenlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=85#comment-11204</guid>
		<description>Hi Victor:

When we normalize the window for a stream, the stream becomes slow because the window size is smaller, but the connection remains. This case is different than the former normalizing the wscale.

Is my understanding right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Victor:</p>
<p>When we normalize the window for a stream, the stream becomes slow because the window size is smaller, but the connection remains. This case is different than the former normalizing the wscale.</p>
<p>Is my understanding right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Julien</title>
		<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/16/tcp-window-scaling-in-snort_inline.html#comment-11196</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Julien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 19:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=85#comment-11196</guid>
		<description>The connection remains, but no data is sent over it anymore. In the post I linked to I described why that makes sense and why the window scaling normalization is broken and should not be used. The concept is just flawed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The connection remains, but no data is sent over it anymore. In the post I linked to I described why that makes sense and why the window scaling normalization is broken and should not be used. The concept is just flawed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuzhenlin</title>
		<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/16/tcp-window-scaling-in-snort_inline.html#comment-11194</link>
		<dc:creator>chuzhenlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 14:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=85#comment-11194</guid>
		<description>Lower the wscales of the client and server just make the stream slow, but the connection still remains. Right?
Does the window size tell another host how much space the sender has to receive the packets?
Sorry for my poor commen sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lower the wscales of the client and server just make the stream slow, but the connection still remains. Right?<br />
Does the window size tell another host how much space the sender has to receive the packets?<br />
Sorry for my poor commen sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Julien</title>
		<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/16/tcp-window-scaling-in-snort_inline.html#comment-11190</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Julien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 10:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=85#comment-11190</guid>
		<description>No, please see &lt;a href="http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/09/04/window-scaling-normalization-in-snort_inline-broken-by-design.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; post. The wscale normalization principle is just flawed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, please see <a href="http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/09/04/window-scaling-normalization-in-snort_inline-broken-by-design.html" rel="nofollow">this</a> post. The wscale normalization principle is just flawed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuzhenlin</title>
		<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/16/tcp-window-scaling-in-snort_inline.html#comment-11189</link>
		<dc:creator>chuzhenlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 03:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=85#comment-11189</guid>
		<description>Stream4 65 revision nornalizes the wscale of option in tcp header  while stream4 69 revision normalizes the window size of tcp header. What if we add an option in the configure file. When the cpu is busy, we just normalize the wscale of syn packets because only syn packets of three handshake have the wscale option work. Then we dont have to modify all packets in a steam.

Will it work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stream4 65 revision nornalizes the wscale of option in tcp header  while stream4 69 revision normalizes the window size of tcp header. What if we add an option in the configure file. When the cpu is busy, we just normalize the wscale of syn packets because only syn packets of three handshake have the wscale option work. Then we dont have to modify all packets in a steam.</p>
<p>Will it work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Julien</title>
		<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/16/tcp-window-scaling-in-snort_inline.html#comment-11184</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Julien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 15:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=85#comment-11184</guid>
		<description>See &lt;a href="http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/11/17/new-snort_inline-tcp-window-normalization-code-in-svn.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://snort-inline.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/snort-inline/trunk/src/preprocessors/spp_stream4.c?view=diff&#038;r1=69&#038;r2=65&#038;diff_format=h" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; for the current implementation.

Wrt the speeds, it all depends on the hardware you use. It's hard to make general statements about that...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See <a href="http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/11/17/new-snort_inline-tcp-window-normalization-code-in-svn.html" rel="nofollow">here</a> and <a href="http://snort-inline.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/snort-inline/trunk/src/preprocessors/spp_stream4.c?view=diff&#038;r1=69&#038;r2=65&#038;diff_format=h" rel="nofollow">here</a> for the current implementation.</p>
<p>Wrt the speeds, it all depends on the hardware you use. It&#8217;s hard to make general statements about that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuzhenlin</title>
		<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/16/tcp-window-scaling-in-snort_inline.html#comment-11182</link>
		<dc:creator>chuzhenlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 07:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=85#comment-11182</guid>
		<description>What high speed links will snort_inline perform badly when it deal with? 10M? 20M?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What high speed links will snort_inline perform badly when it deal with? 10M? 20M?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuzhenlin</title>
		<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/16/tcp-window-scaling-in-snort_inline.html#comment-11181</link>
		<dc:creator>chuzhenlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 04:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=85#comment-11181</guid>
		<description>Would you please offer me the exact code that implements modifying tcp window scale or can you figure out which part in spp_stream4.c is about the two options?

Thank you Victor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you please offer me the exact code that implements modifying tcp window scale or can you figure out which part in spp_stream4.c is about the two options?</p>
<p>Thank you Victor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuzhenlin</title>
		<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/16/tcp-window-scaling-in-snort_inline.html#comment-11179</link>
		<dc:creator>chuzhenlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=85#comment-11179</guid>
		<description>I am interested in the code difference after you add two options to the stream4 preprocessor. Would please offer me the exact code that implements modifying tcp window scale?

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interested in the code difference after you add two options to the stream4 preprocessor. Would please offer me the exact code that implements modifying tcp window scale?</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
