Comments on: Snort and the GPL version 3 http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/29/snort-and-the-gpl-version-3.html Everything inline. Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:15:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Inliniac » Blog Archive » Snort license changes revisited http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/29/snort-and-the-gpl-version-3.html#comment-5606 Inliniac » Blog Archive » Snort license changes revisited Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:40:32 +0000 http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=90#comment-5606 [...] a licensing problem. I have written about my issues with Sourcefires Snort licensing before here and on the mailinglist as well, here. They seem to have listened a little bit, since they are no [...] [...] a licensing problem. I have written about my issues with Sourcefires Snort licensing before here and on the mailinglist as well, here. They seem to have listened a little bit, since they are no [...]

]]> By: william metcalf http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/29/snort-and-the-gpl-version-3.html#comment-5120 william metcalf Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:55:36 +0000 http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=90#comment-5120 I completely agree with/endorse the statements above. Regards, Will I completely agree with/endorse the statements above.

Regards,

Will

]]> By: Bleeding Edge Threats http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/29/snort-and-the-gpl-version-3.html#comment-4989 Bleeding Edge Threats Fri, 29 Jun 2007 23:54:15 +0000 http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=90#comment-4989 <strong>Sourcefire Changing the License on Snort…...</strong> Snort announced yet another license change. See below: http://www.snort.org/pub-bin/snortnews.cgi#664 In essence they are rejecting the inherent condition of the GPL that future versions apply at the users discretion, even though their source code says... Sourcefire Changing the License on Snort……

Snort announced yet another license change. See below:
http://www.snort.org/pub-bin/snortnews.cgi#664
In essence they are rejecting the inherent condition of the GPL that future versions apply at the users discretion, even though their source code says…

]]>