<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Extracting bad url&#8217;s from ModSecurity events in Sguil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2009/01/15/extracting-bad-urls-from-modsecurity-events-in-sguil.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2009/01/15/extracting-bad-urls-from-modsecurity-events-in-sguil.html</link>
	<description>Everything inline.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:26:44 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Victor Julien</title>
		<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2009/01/15/extracting-bad-urls-from-modsecurity-events-in-sguil.html/comment-page-1#comment-14072</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Julien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=220#comment-14072</guid>
		<description>@Adam, see Ryan Barnett&#039;s explanation above!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Adam, see Ryan Barnett&#8217;s explanation above!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Humphreys</title>
		<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2009/01/15/extracting-bad-urls-from-modsecurity-events-in-sguil.html/comment-page-1#comment-14070</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Humphreys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=220#comment-14070</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the very useful information. Do you know why the URL ends with a “?”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the very useful information. Do you know why the URL ends with a “?”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Julien</title>
		<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2009/01/15/extracting-bad-urls-from-modsecurity-events-in-sguil.html/comment-page-1#comment-13690</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Julien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 06:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=220#comment-13690</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that explanation Ryan. Do you see any danger for false positives when blocking request URI&#039;s ending in a &quot;?&quot;. On my Wordpress blog I&#039;ve not seen any FP so far...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that explanation Ryan. Do you see any danger for false positives when blocking request URI&#8217;s ending in a &#8220;?&#8221;. On my Wordpress blog I&#8217;ve not seen any FP so far&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Barnett</title>
		<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2009/01/15/extracting-bad-urls-from-modsecurity-events-in-sguil.html/comment-page-1#comment-13652</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Barnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 15:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=220#comment-13652</guid>
		<description>Ofer said - Do you known why does the URL ends with a “?”

It is a technique somewhat similar to SQL Injection payloads utilizing comment specifiers (-- or ;-- or #) at the end of their payloads.  The RFI attackers do not know what the remainder of the PHP code that they are going to be included into is supposed to do.  So, by adding the &quot;?&quot; character, the remainder of the local server PHP code is actually treated as a parameter to the RFI included code.  The injected RFI PHP code simply ignores the parameter data so it will only execute its own code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ofer said &#8211; Do you known why does the URL ends with a “?”</p>
<p>It is a technique somewhat similar to SQL Injection payloads utilizing comment specifiers (&#8211; or ;&#8211; or #) at the end of their payloads.  The RFI attackers do not know what the remainder of the PHP code that they are going to be included into is supposed to do.  So, by adding the &#8220;?&#8221; character, the remainder of the local server PHP code is actually treated as a parameter to the RFI included code.  The injected RFI PHP code simply ignores the parameter data so it will only execute its own code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ofer Shezaf</title>
		<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2009/01/15/extracting-bad-urls-from-modsecurity-events-in-sguil.html/comment-page-1#comment-12587</link>
		<dc:creator>Ofer Shezaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=220#comment-12587</guid>
		<description>I have added this to my list of ModSecurity rules at http://www.xiom.com/signatures-modsecurity. Do you known why does the URL ends with a &quot;?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have added this to my list of ModSecurity rules at <a href="http://www.xiom.com/signatures-modsecurity" rel="nofollow">http://www.xiom.com/signatures-modsecurity</a>. Do you known why does the URL ends with a &#8220;?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Extracting bad url&#8217;s from ModSecurity events in Sguil &#124; PHP-Blog.com</title>
		<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2009/01/15/extracting-bad-urls-from-modsecurity-events-in-sguil.html/comment-page-1#comment-12582</link>
		<dc:creator>Extracting bad url&#8217;s from ModSecurity events in Sguil &#124; PHP-Blog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 05:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=220#comment-12582</guid>
		<description>[...] posted here: Extracting bad url&#8217;s from ModSecurity events in Sguil     Related ArticlesBookmarksTags      Premature optimization is bad 63+ best practice to optimize [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posted here: Extracting bad url&#8217;s from ModSecurity events in Sguil     Related ArticlesBookmarksTags      Premature optimization is bad 63+ best practice to optimize [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nr</title>
		<link>http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2009/01/15/extracting-bad-urls-from-modsecurity-events-in-sguil.html/comment-page-1#comment-12580</link>
		<dc:creator>nr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inliniac.net/blog/?p=220#comment-12580</guid>
		<description>Nice post, Victor.

You can report the sites to Google: http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/report_badware/

OpenDNS has domain tagging, but it does not appear to include malicious sites. The closest thing I see is an &#039;adware&#039; tag: http://www.opendns.com/community/domaintagging/about/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, Victor.</p>
<p>You can report the sites to Google: <a href="http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/report_badware/" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/report_badware/</a></p>
<p>OpenDNS has domain tagging, but it does not appear to include malicious sites. The closest thing I see is an &#8216;adware&#8217; tag: <a href="http://www.opendns.com/community/domaintagging/about/" rel="nofollow">http://www.opendns.com/community/domaintagging/about/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
