<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Snortsam on Inliniac</title>
    <link>https://inliniac.net/blog/category/snortsam/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Snortsam on Inliniac</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:30:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://inliniac.net/blog/category/snortsam/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>New Snortsam patch for Snort 2.8.0.1</title>
      <link>https://inliniac.net/blog/2008/01/08/new-snortsam-patch-for-snort-2801/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://inliniac.net/blog/2008/01/08/new-snortsam-patch-for-snort-2801/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Matt Jonkman of &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.emergingthreats.net/&#34;&gt;Emerging Threats&lt;/a&gt; asked me to have a look at the existing Snortsam 2.8.0.1 patch as people were continuing to report problems with it. I updated it to compile without compiler warnings, build cleanly with debugging enabled, build cleanly with Snort&amp;rsquo;s IPv6 support enabled and added a check so it won&amp;rsquo;t act on alerts in IPv6 packets since the Snortsam framework does not support IPv6. Finally I removed the patch script so it&amp;rsquo;s provided as a &amp;rsquo;normal&amp;rsquo; diff. Here is the patch: &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.inliniac.net/files/snortsam-2.8.0.1.diff&#34;&gt;http://www.inliniac.net/files/snortsam-2.8.0.1.diff&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
